Court Emphasizes Need for Thorough Investigation in Grave Offenses Involving Acid
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a First Information Report (FIR) related to an acid attack case. The court underscored the necessity for a comprehensive investigation given the severity of offenses involving acid as a weapon. The case, arising from a property dispute, involves allegations against Arun Shukla, among others, for conspiring in the attack.
The judgment, delivered by a division bench comprising Justices J.J. Munir and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi, highlighted the grave nature of acid attack cases, necessitating meticulous investigation. The court found no grounds to interfere with the FIR under Article 226 of the Constitution, thereby dismissing the petition filed by Arun Shukla.
The case pertains to an FIR dated December 6, 2025, linked to Case Crime No. 384 of 2025, under Sections 352, 351(3), and 124(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the attack was orchestrated due to a property dispute, with Rohit Sharma as the primary assailant, acting under the influence of other accused, including the petitioner.
Additionally, the court expressed strong disapproval towards the police for delays in forwarding injury reports, which are crucial for ongoing investigations. The bench warned of summoning higher police officials if corrective actions are not implemented promptly to ensure the timely provision of these reports.
The court directed that a copy of the order be communicated to the Director General of Police, U.P., and the Additional Chief Secretary (Home), U.P., highlighting the urgency for remedial measures. This ruling sets a precedent for handling similar cases, reinforcing the judiciary's commitment to addressing serious crimes with the gravity they warrant.
Bottom Line:
Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR in an acid attack-related case dismissed by the High Court, emphasizing the need for thorough investigation in cases involving acid as a weapon of assault.
Statutory provision(s): Sections 352, 351(3), 124(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Arun Shukla v. State of U.P., (Allahabad)(DB) : Law Finder Doc id # 2880741
