Advocate Ashutosh Kumar Mishra's apology accepted by the court, bringing an end to the criminal contempt case.
Allahabad, March 25, 2026 - In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court today concluded the criminal contempt proceedings against Advocate Ashutosh Kumar Mishra following his unconditional and unqualified apology. The proceedings stemmed from an incident on February 12, 2026, where Mishra raised his voice and made statements deemed offensive and scandalizing in open court.
The Division Bench, comprising Justices Siddhartha Varma and Jai Krishna Upadhyay, presided over the case. The situation arose during the hearing of Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5069 of 2026, where Mishra represented an individual named Kunal. During the session, the court instructed the learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) to file a counter affidavit with necessary evidence and injury reports within three weeks. It was at this point that Mishra vocally questioned the court's authority and implied governmental pressure on judicial proceedings.
The court, initially perceiving Mishra's actions as an attempt to interfere with judicial proceedings, referred the matter for suitable action. The statements were considered prima facie evidence of criminal contempt, prompting further examination by the court.
However, in today's proceedings, Mishra, represented by his counsel Sri Shri Kant Shukla and supported by other Bar Association members, expressed deep remorse. Mishra personally attended the session, demonstrating contrition and assuring the court that such behavior would not recur.
Acknowledging Mishra's sincere apology, the court decided to drop the contempt proceedings. The judges expressed satisfaction with the apology, noting that Mishra's demeanor reflected genuine remorse and a commitment to uphold the dignity of the court in the future.
This resolution underscores the importance of maintaining decorum in courtrooms and upholding the judiciary's integrity. It also highlights the court's willingness to forgive when genuine contrition is displayed, reinforcing the values of justice and reconciliation.
The case records have been consigned, marking the official closure of this matter.
Bottom Line:
Criminal Contempt - Advocate raised voice in open court and made statements scandalizing the court - Court felt offended and concluded prima facie that the conduct fell within the ambit of criminal contempt - Advocate tendered unconditional and unqualified apology in open court - Considering the apology, contempt proceedings dropped.
Statutory provision(s): Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
In Re v. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, (Allahabad)(DB) : Law Finder Doc id # 2874256
