Allahabad High Court Frames Charges of Criminal Contempt Against Krishna Kumar Pandey
Contemnor Refuses Legal Representation; Court Scrutinizes Bar Association's Social Media Practices
In a significant development from the Allahabad High Court, charges of criminal contempt have been framed against Krishna Kumar Pandey, following allegations of circulating derogatory WhatsApp messages about a judicial officer. The Division Bench, comprising Justices J.J. Munir and Pramod Kumar Srivastava, delivered the decision on September 18, 2025, after extensive hearings.
The matter originated from a reference by the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court-I, Basti, under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. It was alleged that Pandey posted defamatory messages in a WhatsApp group of advocates, calculated to scandalize and undermine the authority of the court. Despite being offered legal representation through the High Court Legal Services Committee, Pandey opted to defend himself, resulting in proceedings being conducted without counsel.
The court's decision underscores the seriousness of the allegations, which include accusations of corruption and misconduct against the presiding officer, attempts to delay proceedings, and creating obstructions in court processes. These actions were deemed to lower the court's authority and image, constituting criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Beyond the charges against Pandey, the judgment addresses broader concerns regarding the role of bar associations in managing social media group memberships. The court has directed various bar associations in Basti to investigate their WhatsApp group memberships and take corrective action to prevent misuse. This move aims to ensure only legitimate practicing lawyers can join such groups, safeguarding the integrity of communications within the legal community.
Despite repeated opportunities for legal representation, Pandey's refusal led the court to proceed with framing charges. The court emphasized that this would be the last indulgence granted to Pandey regarding legal counsel, highlighting the importance of proper representation in contempt proceedings.
The case will be heard further on October 9, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., with Pandey required to be present. This judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary's commitment to maintaining its authority and the decorum expected in legal communications, especially in digital forums.
Bottom Line:
Criminal Contempt of Court - Allegations of circulating derogatory WhatsApp messages against a Judicial Officer - Refusal of contemnor to engage legal counsel despite being provided opportunities - Prima facie case established for criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Statutory provision(s): Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Sections 2(c), 12
In Re. v. Krishna Kumar Pandey, (Allahabad)(DB) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2789702
