LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Bombay High Court Mandates Strict Adherence to Minimum Sentencing in POCSO Cases

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | March 10, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Bombay High Court Mandates Strict Adherence to Minimum Sentencing in POCSO Cases

Court enforces statutory minimum sentences, reinforcing protection under the POCSO Act and IPC


In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad Bench, presided over by Justice Rajnish R. Vyas, has underscored the necessity of imposing statutory minimum sentences in cases involving aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, and Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).


The case involved the appellant, Santosh Maroti Bhandare, who was initially sentenced by the Trial Court to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for offences under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(n) of the IPC. However, the High Court found this sentence to be below the statutory minimum, which mandates at least 20 years for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act and 10 years for repeated rape under the IPC.


The court clarified that imposing the statutory minimum sentence does not amount to an enhancement of the sentence but ensures compliance with legal mandates. This decision came in response to appeals from both the accused, challenging his conviction, and the victim, seeking the imposition of the statutory minimum sentence.


Justice Vyas emphasized the overriding nature of the POCSO Act provisions in cases of inconsistency with the IPC, highlighting the Act's intent to provide greater protection to children and ensure severe penalties for offenders. The court also reaffirmed the legal principle that the consent of a minor is not valid under the law, thereby supporting the victim's age and circumstances in determining the crime's gravity.


The judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in upholding statutory mandates and the importance of appropriate sentencing in deterring crimes against children. The court's decision to impose the statutory minimum sentences aligns with the legislative intent to provide uniformity and consistency in punishment for serious offences, reinforcing the POCSO Act's protective framework.


Bottom Line:

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Minimum statutory sentence under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(n) of IPC must be imposed; any omission to award such minimum statutory punishment is impermissible in law.


Statutory provision(s): Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 6, 29, 30, 42, 42A; Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376(2)(n), 363, 366A; Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 372, 386, 313, 235, 354, 28


Santosh Maroti Bhandare v. State of Maharashtra, (Bombay)(Aurangabad Bench) : Law Finder Doc id # 2854956

Share this article: