LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Bombay High Court Upholds Maternity Benefits for Contractual Employees

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | March 5, 2026 at 2:56 PM
Bombay High Court Upholds Maternity Benefits for Contractual Employees

Court Rules Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 Encompasses Contractual Employees, Ensures Protection Under Constitutional Rights


In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that contractual employees are entitled to maternity benefits under the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices R.I. Chagla and Advait M. Sethna, pertains to a writ petition filed by Dhanashri Ramesh Karkhanis, a contractual Assistant Professor at Seth G. S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, challenging the denial of maternity benefits by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM).


The case revolved around Karkhanis, who was employed on a contractual basis and sought maternity leave and benefits as per the provisions of the Maternity Benefits Act. Despite fulfilling the eligibility criteria, her request was denied on the grounds that the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation Service Rules did not apply to contractual employees.


The court held that the provisions of the Maternity Benefits Act, 1961, override any inconsistent terms in employment agreements or contracts. It emphasized that contractual employees fulfilling the eligibility criteria under Section 5(2) of the Act are entitled to maternity benefits, and any rejection based on the nature of employment is contrary to the Act's provisions.


The judgment also emphasized the constitutional significance of maternity benefits, linking them to Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, and Article 42, which mandates the State to secure humane working conditions and maternity relief. The court asserted that denying maternity benefits infringes upon the fundamental rights of women employees.


Additionally, the court dismissed the respondents' contention that the petitioner had failed to disclose her pregnancy at the time of her contractual engagement, noting that she had duly informed the authorities and fulfilled the procedural requirements under the Act.


The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to grant the petitioner the maternity benefits to which she is entitled under the Maternity Benefits Act, within six weeks. This decision underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rights of women in the workforce, ensuring that contractual employment does not become a barrier to accessing statutory entitlements.


Bottom Line:

Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 - Contractual employees are entitled to maternity benefits under the Act regardless of their employment agreement or contract terms.


Statutory provision(s): Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 Sections 5, 6, and 27; Constitution of India, Articles 21 and 42


Dhanashri Ramesh Karkhanis v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, (Bombay)(DB) : Law Finder Doc id # 2859789

Share this article: