LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Calcutta High Court Dismisses Maan Steel's Petition Against Indian Bank Over Debt Settlement Dispute

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | June 17, 2026 at 11:33 AM
Calcutta High Court Dismisses Maan Steel's Petition Against Indian Bank Over Debt Settlement Dispute

Court Upholds Bank's Right to Retain Securities Until Full Settlement of All Contractual Liabilities


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court, presided over by Justice Rai Chattopadhyay, has dismissed a writ petition filed by Maan Steel and Power Limited against Indian Bank. The dispute centered on the bank's retention of Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) and refusal to issue a 'No Due Certificate' despite the repayment of the principal loan amount. The court held that Indian Bank was justified in retaining the securities until the complete discharge of all contractual liabilities, including prepayment charges, commitment charges, and processing fees, which fall under the ambit of "debt" as per Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.


Maan Steel had initially availed credit facilities amounting to Rs. 94 Crores from a consortium of banks, including Indian Bank. Subsequently, the company transferred its loan accounts to ICICI Bank due to lower interest rates. However, Indian Bank raised a demand of Rs. 42,46,557, claiming it as unpaid charges that were part of the loan agreement.


The court observed that the term "debt" encompasses all liabilities arising from a lending transaction, not just the principal and interest. It was noted that the contractual documents clearly stipulated the recovery of such charges, and the bank's demand was consistent with the agreement's provisions.


Justice Chattopadhyay emphasized that the bank's actions were within its rights and aligned with established banking practices. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that the debt was fully settled upon the transfer of the principal and interest to ICICI Bank, highlighting that the security continues until all obligations are discharged.


The decision reinforces the principle that banks can retain securities until the complete settlement of all dues, ensuring lenders' protection in commercial transactions.


Bottom line:-

Commercial lending arrangements - Borrower's liability to pay prepayment charges, commitment charges, and processing fees arising under a lending transaction falls within the ambit of "debt" under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, and the lender is entitled to retain pledged securities until full discharge of such liabilities.


Statutory provision(s): Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Section 2(g); Constitution Of India - Article 226


Maan Steel and Power Limited v. Indian Bank, (Calcutta) : Law Finder Doc id # 2920594

Share this article: