Court emphasizes on parity with co-accused and dismisses vague grounds of non-cooperation in investigation.
In a significant development, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice Girish Kathpalia, has granted anticipatory bail to Ravjeet Singh, who was implicated in a corruption case involving high-ranking officials and private defense firms. The court's decision comes despite the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) opposition, which was deemed vague by the court.
The case, registered under FIR No. RC2172025A0024, involves allegations against Lt. Col. Deepak Sharma and associates, including Singh, for engaging in corrupt practices and conspiracy. The prosecution alleged that Singh, managing the India operations of a Dubai-based company, conspired with Sharma to secure undue favors from government departments in exchange for illegal gratification. Evidence presented by the CBI mainly consisted of WhatsApp chat screenshots.
Justice Kathpalia highlighted the principle of parity, noting that the main accused, Lt. Col. Deepak Sharma, had already been granted bail. The CBI's primary objection to Singh's bail was the apprehension that he might not cooperate with the investigation. However, the court found this ground insufficient, emphasizing that a mere expectation of non-cooperation without substantive evidence is not a valid reason to deny bail.
During the proceedings, it was revealed that Singh was not arrested initially due to interim protection and the absence of concrete grounds for immediate arrest. The court further noted that the main chargesheet had already been filed, and the investigation was progressing towards a supplementary chargesheet.
In granting bail, the court mandated Singh to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of the same amount. Additionally, Singh is required to join the investigation as directed by the Investigating Officer and refrain from tampering with evidence.
This judgment underscores the judiciary's commitment to ensuring fair legal processes, especially when the grounds for detention are not adequately substantiated.
Bottom Line:
Anticipatory bail granted despite opposition from CBI, considering parity with co-accused already granted bail and vague grounds of opposition.
Statutory provision(s): Prevention of Corruption Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61(2)
Ravjeet Singh v. Central Bureau Of Investigation, (Delhi) : Law Finder Doc id # 2865585
