LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Delhi High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Domain Infringing IKEA's Trademarks

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | May 23, 2026 at 11:36 AM
Delhi High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Domain Infringing IKEA's Trademarks

Trademark and Copyright Protection Ensured for IKEA in Dispute Against Unauthorized Use by 'keiekae.store'


In a significant move to safeguard intellectual property rights, the Delhi High Court has granted an interim injunction to Inter Ikea Systems BV, effectively restraining the defendants, including John Doe and others, from unauthorized use of IKEA's registered trademarks and copyrighted website layout. The order, passed by Justice Jyoti Singh on May 20, 2026, aims to prevent the defendants from exploiting IKEA's intellectual property in domain names, websites, promotional materials, and other business activities.


The case, titled "Inter Ikea Systems BV v. John Doe," centers around the unauthorized use of IKEA's distinctive trademarks and the layout of its website by the domain 'keiekae.store'. The court, acknowledging the prima facie infringement of IKEA's trademarks and copyright, has directed the defendants to cease any usage that might amount to trademark infringement or copyright violation. This includes refraining from using IKEA's trademarks or their variations in any digital or print media, as well as the layout of IKEA's official website.


The plaintiff, represented by advocates Ms. Ruchira Yadav and Mr. Vardaan Anand, argued that the defendants were infringing upon IKEA's intellectual property by using similar trademarks and website layouts without authorization, thus misleading consumers and potentially damaging IKEA's brand reputation.


The court's decision to grant a temporary injunction is based on provisions under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, specifically Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, which allows for such relief to protect the plaintiff's rights until a detailed hearing can take place. The court has mandated compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC within two weeks, ensuring that the defendants are formally notified of the injunction.


This ruling underscores the importance of protecting intellectual property rights in the digital age, where unauthorized use and imitation can lead to significant brand damage and consumer confusion. The case will next be heard on July 20, 2026, providing the defendants an opportunity to respond to the allegations and present their defense.


Bottom line:-

Trademark infringement and copyright violation - Temporary injunction granted to restrain Defendant from using Plaintiff's registered trademarks and layout/user interface of Plaintiff's website in any manner, including as part of domain names, websites, or promotional/business activities.


Statutory provision(s): Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, Order XXXIX Rule 3, Order I Rule 10, Section 151 CPC, Order VI Rule 17.


Inter Ikea Systems BV v. John Doe, (Delhi) : Law Finder Doc id # 2904781

Share this article: