Delhi High Court Issues Bailable Warrants Against Contemnor for Defiance of Court Orders

Respondent's Non-Cooperation and Disrespectful Comments Lead to Coercive Measures

In a recent ruling by the Delhi High Court, bailable warrants have been issued against Adeeshwar Singhal, the respondent in a contempt of court case, for failing to comply with the court's directive to be physically present during proceedings. The court's decision was prompted by the respondent's continued non-cooperation and disrespectful behavior towards the judicial process.

The bench, comprising Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Manoj Jain, was compelled to take strict measures after the respondent failed to appear physically despite clear instructions from the court. Instead, Adeeshwar Singhal attended the hearing via video conferencing, providing vague responses regarding his location and making derogatory remarks about the court proceedings.

The case, initiated by the Court on its own motion, highlights the challenges faced by the judiciary in enforcing compliance with court orders. The legal aid counsel initially representing the respondent, Mr. Ravi Nayak, expressed difficulties in filing a reply due to the respondent's uncooperative attitude. Consequently, Mr. Nayak sought discharge from the case, which was granted by the court upon the appointment of a new counsel by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.

The court's order dated October 9, 2025, mandated the respondent's physical presence along with a filed reply by November 6, 2025. However, the respondent's failure to comply led to the issuance of bailable warrants amounting to Rs. 10,000 to ensure his attendance at the next hearing.

The Delhi High Court's decision underscores the importance of respecting judicial procedures and the potential consequences of contemptuous conduct. The case is scheduled for further proceedings on December 2, 2025.

Bottom Line:

Contempt proceedings initiated against respondent/contemnor for non-cooperation and defiance of court orders - Respondent failed to appear physically despite court directions and made disrespectful comments about the proceedings - Court issued bailable warrants to ensure respondent's presence.

Statutory provision(s): Contempt of Court Act, relevant provisions for issuance of bailable warrants, Legal Services Authorities Act (for appointment of legal aid counsel).

Court On Its Own Motion v. Adeeshwar Singhal, (Delhi)(DB) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2806123