LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | April 25, 2026 at 11:32 AM
Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case

Revision Application Dismissed; Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under NI Act Upheld


In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court has dismissed the revision application filed by Rajubhai Kalidas Chunara challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonor of cheques issued to Kantibhai Kalyanjibhai Shah. The judgment, delivered by Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar, reinforces the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act regarding the existence of a legally enforceable debt upon admission of signature on the cheques.


The case stems from a financial transaction where Chunara, a Peon, received a hand loan of Rs. 3,50,000 from Shah, a Professor at M.S. University, Vadodara. Cheques issued by Chunara as repayment were dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite partial payments before the cheque issuance, the court upheld that the liability under Section 138 of the NI Act was not negated, as the cheques represented a legally enforceable debt.


The applicant's arguments, including claims of non-service of notice and misuse of blank cheques, were rejected based on statutory presumptions and the evidence presented. The court emphasized that once the signature on the cheque is admitted, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt arises unless rebutted by a preponderance of probabilities.


Chunara's conviction by the trial court, entailing three months' simple imprisonment and compensation payment of Rs. 3,38,000, was previously upheld by the Vadodara Sessions Court. The High Court ruled that revisional jurisdiction could not substitute factual findings of lower courts unless found to be perverse or erroneous, affirming the decisions of the lower courts.


This judgment reiterates the legal principles governing cheque dishonor cases, emphasizing the importance of statutory presumptions and the limited scope of revisional jurisdiction in criminal matters.


Bottom Line:

Dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the NI Act - Revision application dismissed as there was legally enforceable debt and cheques were issued towards repayment - Presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of NI Act upheld - Part payment made prior to issuance of cheques does not negate liability under Section 138 NI Act.


Statutory provision(s): Section 138, Section 118, Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Section 397, Section 401, Section 313, Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973; Section 27 of the General Clauses Act


Rajubhai Kalidas Chunara v. Kantibhai Kalyanjibhai Shah, (Gujarat) : Law Finder Doc id # 2870618

Share this article: