LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Legitimacy of 8th Class Certificate in Controversial Appointment Case

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | March 20, 2026 at 3:06 PM
Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Legitimacy of 8th Class Certificate in Controversial Appointment Case

Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment Based on Alleged Invalid Certificate, Cites No Age Restriction Beyond 14 for Education Continuation


In a significant ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the appointment of a Part-Time Multi-Task Worker on the grounds of an allegedly fraudulent 8th class certificate. The petitioner, Pankaj Chauhan, contended that the private respondent's admission to a private school after crossing the age of fourteen violated the Right to Education Act, 2009. However, the court, led by Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, upheld the appointment, asserting that the Act does not bar individuals over fourteen from continuing their education.


The controversy arose when Chauhan challenged the appointment process initiated by the Government Primary School Rajaina, District Sirmour. He claimed that the private respondent had obtained the 8th class certificate illegally from Himalayan Public Senior Secondary School after failing in another school. The petitioner's appeals had already been dismissed by the relevant authorities, including the Director of School Education, who verified the certificate's authenticity.


Justice Goel emphasized that the Right to Education Act is designed to provide free and compulsory education for children aged six to fourteen but does not restrict educational pursuits beyond this age. The court found no legal basis for Chauhan's claim that the respondent's certificate was invalid due to his age at the time of admission. The judgment reaffirmed the respondent's eligibility and the validity of the certificate, as verified by school records.


This ruling underscores the court's interpretation of the Right to Education Act, focusing on facilitating education rather than imposing age-related restrictions. The decision is expected to have implications for similar cases where age and educational rights intersect.


Bottom Line:

Right to Education Act, 2009 - No statutory bar for admission above the age of fourteen years in Class 8th for continuation of education.


Statutory provision(s):

Right to Education Act, 2009, Article 21-A of the Constitution, Section 5 and 30 of the Right to Education Act, 2009


Pankaj Chauhan v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (Himachal Pradesh) : Law Finder Doc id # 2866129

Share this article: