LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Karnataka High Court Resolves Mimicry Controversy with Apology and Temple Visit Mandate

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | May 1, 2026 at 4:35 PM
Karnataka High Court Resolves Mimicry Controversy with Apology and Temple Visit Mandate

Artist Ranveer Singh's Case Closed After Apology and Commitment to Visit Mysuru Temple


In a notable judgment, the Karnataka High Court on April 25, 2026, brought closure to a contentious legal battle involving famed artist Ranveer Singh. The case stemmed from a complaint filed against Singh for alleged mimicry during a public event, which was deemed disrespectful to certain religious sentiments. The complaint led to the registration of a crime under sections 196, 299, and 302 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.


The incident occurred during the closing ceremony of the 56th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) on November 28, 2025. Singh, while promoting his upcoming movie "Dhurandar," mimicked the performance of fellow actor Rishab Shetty, leading to public outrage and subsequent legal action. The complaint was formally lodged on December 3, 2025, and the case escalated to a Crime No. 17/2026.


Presiding over the matter, Justice M. Nagaprasanna directed Singh to file an affidavit of apology and undertake a visit to the Shri Chamundeshwari Temple in Mysuru. Singh complied by tendering a heartfelt apology and committed to visiting the temple to express his devotion. The affidavit outlined Singh's respect for all religious communities and conveyed his sincere regret for any unintentional offense caused.


While there were initial objections from the respondents concerning the lack of a timeline for the temple visit, these were mitigated by Singh's expression of regret and the court's directive. Justice Nagaprasanna closed the proceedings against Singh, imposing a requirement for the temple visit to occur within four weeks from the order's receipt.


The court's decision underscores the importance of sensitivity towards cultural and religious sentiments in public expressions. The judgment serves as a reminder to public figures about the potential repercussions of their actions and the value of addressing grievances with sincerity.


Bottom line:-

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 196, 299, and 302 - Complaint filed against an artist for alleged mimicry during a public event - Apology tendered and undertaking provided by petitioner to visit the temple - Proceedings closed with a directive to comply with the undertaking within four weeks.


Statutory provision(s): Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 196, 299, 302


Shri Ranveer Singh v. State of Karnataka, (Karnataka) : Law Finder Doc id # 2891867

Share this article: