LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Karnataka High Court Upholds Right to Legal Representation in Insurance Ombudsman Proceedings

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | May 6, 2026 at 4:44 PM
Karnataka High Court Upholds Right to Legal Representation in Insurance Ombudsman Proceedings

Court Rules Denial of Legal Assistance in Adjudicatory Stage Contrary to Principles of Natural Justice


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has upheld the right of claimants to legal representation during the adjudicatory stage of proceedings before the Insurance Ombudsman. The court found that denying legal assistance during this stage is contrary to the principles of natural justice and statutory provisions.


The case arose when Sri. M.V. Narasimha Prasad, a petitioner, challenged the decision of the Insurance Ombudsman to deny him legal representation during the adjudicatory stage of his claim. The petitioner had subscribed to a 'Family Health Optima Insurance Plan' and sought reimbursement for medical expenses incurred due to surgery. After the insurer repudiated his claim, Prasad approached the Insurance Ombudsman but was initially denied legal representation.


The High Court, presided by Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum, reviewed the provisions of the Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017, particularly Rules 15, 16, and 17, which guide the ombudsman's actions from mediation to adjudication. The court determined that once mediation fails and the process moves to adjudication, the proceedings take on a quasi-judicial nature, thereby necessitating the right to legal representation.


The ruling emphasized that the adjudicatory proceedings involve pleadings and evidence, thus requiring a formal process where claimants must be allowed to engage legal practitioners. The court highlighted that vulnerable claimants, such as those unfamiliar with legal or technical matters, should not be denied the right to effectively present their cases with professional legal assistance.


The judgment aligns with the precedent set by the Telangana High Court in a similar case, reinforcing the statutory right of advocates to represent parties in quasi-judicial proceedings under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961.


This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for insurance claimants, ensuring that they can seek legal assistance to safeguard their rights during the adjudicatory process of insurance disputes.


Bottom Line:

Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017 - Right to legal representation before Insurance Ombudsman during adjudicatory stage under Rule 17 upheld - Denial of legal assistance contrary to principles of natural justice and statutory provisions.


Statutory provision(s): Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017 - Rules 15, 16, 17; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30


Sri. M.V. Narasimha Prasad v. Office of The Insurance Ombudsman (Karnataka), (Karnataka) : Law Finder Doc id # 2887151

Share this article: