Court Sets Date for Future Hearing Without Addressing Substantive Legal Issues
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued a procedural order in the case of Ajay Dubey v. Union of India, with the bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf presiding over the matter. The court has issued notices to the respondents and has scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing on February 11, 2026. The case, filed under the category of civil proceedings, did not see any substantive legal principles being deliberated upon during this session.
The petitioner, Ajay Dubey, represented by Senior Advocate Aditya Sanghi along with advocates Ms. Alka Singh, Ms. Vinita Ahuja, and Ms. Anushka Singh, brought forth the petition against the Union of India and others. The Union of India was represented by Additional Solicitor General Sunil Jain, with Deputy Solicitor General S.M. Guru and Advocate Dev Sharma. The state was represented by Deputy Advocate General Vivek Sharma.
The court's order primarily focused on procedural aspects, directing notices to be issued to the respondents, which include the Union of India and other concerned parties. The respondents' counsel accepted the notices, and the case was adjourned to allow for further proceedings at a later date.
The judgment did not delve into the substantive issues at hand, indicating that the focus was on ensuring procedural compliance before moving forward with the case. As such, the court has refrained from making any substantive legal determinations at this stage.
Bottom Line:
No substantive decision or legal principle has been highlighted in the given judgment excerpt. The order primarily pertains to procedural aspects of issuing notice and listing the matter for a future date.
Statutory provision(s): Civil Procedure
Ajay Dubey v. Union of India, (Madhya Pradesh)(Jabalpur)(DB) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2841638
