Madras High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in Tragic Stampede Case
Court Highlights Event Organizers' Negligence and Police Accountability in Political Rally Mishap
In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice M. Jothiraman, has denied anticipatory bail to CTR. Nirmal Kumar and others involved in a case concerning a tragic stampede during a political event. The incident, which occurred on September 27, 2025, resulted in the death of 11 people and injuries to many more. The petitioners, who were key organizers of the event, faced charges under Sections 105, 110, 125(b), and 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, along with Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damages & Loss) Act, 1992.
The court emphasized the gravity of the offenses, noting that the event organizers failed to manage the crowd effectively, leading to chaos and a deadly stampede. Despite police permission for the event, the organizers allegedly breached several conditions, including time restrictions and crowd control measures. The court observed that the petitioners' negligence in regulating the crowd and ensuring adequate facilities contributed significantly to the tragedy.
Justice Jothiraman highlighted the ongoing investigation and the preliminary stage of the case, asserting that granting anticipatory bail at this juncture could impede the process. The court also pointed out the necessity for accountability from both the event organizers and the police to prevent such incidents in the future.
The court dismissed the petitions, underscoring that the investigation is still in its early stages and some victims remain hospitalized. The ruling serves as a stern reminder of the critical responsibilities of political event organizers and law enforcement agencies in safeguarding public safety during large gatherings.
Bottom Line:
Anticipatory bail denied to petitioners accused of negligence during a political event resulting in a tragic stampede causing loss of lives and injuries - Court emphasizes the gravity of the incident, the ongoing investigation, and the responsibilities of event organizers.
Statutory provision(s): Sections 105, 110, 125(b), 223 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damages & Loss) Act, 1992
CTR.Nirmal Kumar v. Inspector of Police, (Madras)(Madurai Bench) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2788535
