LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Madras High Court Denies Convict's Leave Request for Fertility Treatment

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | May 14, 2026 at 12:25 PM
Madras High Court Denies Convict's Leave Request for Fertility Treatment

Court Prioritizes Welfare of Unborn Child Over Petitioner's Right to Bear a Child  


The Madras High Court, in a significant ruling, has dismissed a writ petition filed by Jalani, seeking ordinary leave for her convict husband to undergo fertility treatment. The petitioner's husband is serving a life sentence at the Central Prison, Madurai, for a heinous crime involving triple murder. The court, comprising Justices N.Anand Venkatesh and K.K.Ramakrishnan, emphasized that the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, do not provide for granting leave for such purposes, highlighting that leave is a privilege, not a right.  


The petitioner sought leave under Rule 20 of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, citing her desire to have a child and undergo fertility treatment with her convict husband. However, the court noted that the rule does not accommodate such grounds for leave, thereby rejecting the petitioner's claim. The court underscored the societal stigma and psychological impact on the unborn child, expressing concern about the welfare of the child who would be born to a father serving a life sentence for a grave crime.  


Relying on a precedent from the Kerala High Court, where leave was granted for fertility treatment, the petitioner argued for extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the Madras High Court declined to accept the Kerala judgment as a binding precedent, noting its limitation to the specific facts of that case. The court stressed that the privilege of leave must align with the conditions set forth in the relevant rules, focusing on the broader societal implications and the rights of the unborn child.  


The judgment has sparked discussions on the intersection of convicts' rights, societal stigma, and the welfare of children born under such circumstances. The court's decision prioritizes the potential psychological consequences and societal challenges that the child would face, thereby dismissing the writ petition and closing the associated miscellaneous petition without costs.


Bottom line:-

Convict's privilege to seek ordinary leave under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, does not extend to undergoing fertility treatment. Rights of the unborn child and societal stigma must also be considered.


Statutory provision(s): Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, Rule 20; Constitution of India, Article 226.


Jalani v. Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, (Madras)(DB)(Madurai Bench) : Law Finder Doc id # 2897157

Share this article: