Madras High Court Upholds Rule of Law, Orders Compliance with Lighting Ritual at Thirupparankundram Temple

Justice G.R. Swaminathan Enforces Court Order Amidst Alleged Non-Compliance by Temple Authorities

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, under the judgment of Justice G.R. Swaminathan, has taken a firm stance against the non-compliance of its orders by directing the lighting of the Karthigai Deepam at the Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram. The court's decision came in response to a contempt petition filed by Rama Ravikumar, who alleged that the temple authorities failed to adhere to a prior court directive issued on December 1, 2025.

The court had previously instructed the temple management to ensure the lighting of the Deepam at the designated lower peak of the hillock, Deepathoon, at 6:00 PM on the specified date. However, it was reported that while the Deepam was lit at the Uchi Pillaiyar Temple, the ceremony at Deepathoon was not conducted as ordered.

Justice Swaminathan emphasized the essential role of the judiciary in maintaining the rule of law, highlighting the duty of all authorities to comply with judicial directions. He underscored that non-compliance threatens the foundation of democracy and the rule of law, drawing parallels with recent judgments from the Supreme Court and the Kerala High Court that stress the importance of obeying court orders.

In a decisive move to uphold the court's authority, Justice Swaminathan allowed the petitioner to ascend the hill and light the Deepam, accompanied by ten other individuals, under the protection of CISF personnel. This action, while symbolic, served to reinforce the court's mandate and the seriousness of compliance with judicial rulings.

The court's directive serves as a reminder of the judiciary's inherent powers under Articles 129 and 215 of the Constitution, which empower courts to punish for contempt and ensure adherence to their orders. The case has been adjourned for compliance reporting on December 4, 2025, at 1:00 PM.

Bottom Line:

Contempt of Courts - Disobedience of court orders undermines the rule of law and democracy - High Court has inherent power to ensure compliance with its orders and to restore status quo following judicial directions.

Statutory provision(s): Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12, Constitution of India Articles 129 and 215

Rama. Ravikumar v. K.J.Praveenkumar IAS, (Madras)(Madurai Bench) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2817204