The court emphasizes the importance of maintaining safety and discipline at National Law University Odisha.
In a significant decision, the Orissa High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings against Roshan Kumar Pradhan and others, following an amicable settlement between the parties involved. The case, stemming from incidents near the National Law University Odisha, was decided upon by Justice Dr. Sanjeeb K. Panigrahi, who underscored the futility of continuing the proceedings given the mutual resolution achieved by the parties.
The case, which revolved around allegations of abduction, intimidation, and misconduct, was initially registered as G.R. Case No. 790 of 2023. The complainant, a fourth-year student of the National Law University Odisha, alleged that he and his friend were forcibly compelled into a vehicle by the accused, subjected to abusive language, and threatened. However, with the intervention of well-wishers and in consideration of their future, both parties reached an understanding, leading to a joint affidavit affirming the settlement.
Justice Panigrahi, while quashing the proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, referenced the Supreme Court's stance in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and prior decisions of the Orissa High Court. The court highlighted that continuing the criminal process would not serve justice but rather constitute an abuse of court proceedings.
Moreover, the judgment brought attention to recurring issues of safety and misconduct around the university campus. Justice Panigrahi expressed concern over such incidents, emphasizing the need for National Law University Odisha to maintain a secure and conducive environment for academic pursuits.
In a series of directives aimed at ensuring campus security, the court instructed the university and local law enforcement to bolster security measures. These include enhancing campus security, establishing police outposts, preventing the circulation of contraband, and promoting student awareness on safety and legal conduct.
The court's ruling not only resolves the immediate legal dispute but also sets a precedent for ensuring a safe academic environment, reinforcing the role of educational institutions in upholding discipline and security.
Bottom Line:
Quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. permissible where parties have amicably settled the dispute and continuation of proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose or result in abuse of process of court.
Statutory provision(s): Section 482 Cr.P.C, Sections 365, 354-A, 294, 506, and 34 IPC
Roshan Kumar Pradhan v. State of Odisha, (Orissa) : Law Finder Doc id # 2852954
