LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Promotions must be governed rules in force at the time of consideration for promotion, not the rules prevailing when the vacancies arose

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | May 28, 2026 at 2:13 PM
Promotions must be governed  rules in force at the time of consideration for promotion, not the rules prevailing when the vacancies arose

Supreme Court Upholds New Promotion Rules in Andaman & Nicobar Police Department, Court rules promotions must follow current statutory rules, setting aside previous high court judgment.


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has set aside a judgment by the Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Port Blair, concerning the promotion of Head Constables in the Andaman & Nicobar Police Department. The apex court ruled that promotions must adhere to the statutory rules in force at the time of consideration, rather than those in effect when vacancies arose. This decision came in response to a civil appeal by Jagdish Prasad and others against a High Court order that directed vacancies to be filled according to rules prevailing at the time they accrued.


The Supreme Court's decision aligns with its previous ruling in the case of "State of Himachal Pradesh v. Raj Kumar," which overruled the earlier principle established in "Y.V. Rangaiah v. J. Sreenivasa Rao." This principle stated that vacancies should be filled based on the rules existing when they arose. Instead, the Court asserted that public servants have no vested right to be considered under old rules, emphasizing that promotions should be governed by the rules in effect when the selection process is initiated.


The case originated from a dispute over the promotion criteria for Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI)-Executive posts. The 2008 and 2010 Recruitment Rules introduced a merit-cum-seniority and seniority-cum-fitness method for promotions, which was contested by some employees. The controversy further intensified with the issuance of the 2016 Rules, which abolished the selection test and instituted promotions solely on a seniority-cum-fitness basis.


The Supreme Court clarified that the word "substitution," as used in legislative amendments, implies the repeal of the old rule and its replacement with a new one. Therefore, the 2016 Rules effectively govern all promotions moving forward. The Court also emphasized that ad hoc promotions do not confer permanent rights or seniority, particularly when such promotions are subject to pending litigation outcomes.


This ruling mandates that the Andaman & Nicobar Administration conduct promotions under the 2016 Rules for existing and future vacancies, ensuring a uniform and fair application of the law. The decision is expected to impact promotional procedures in various government departments, reinforcing the principle that current statutory rules should dictate promotions rather than outdated regulations.


Statutory provision(s): Article 309 of the Constitution, General Clauses Act, 1897, 2008 Recruitment Rules, 2010 Recruitment Rules, 2016 Recruitment Rules.


Jagdish Prasad v. P.M. Manoj Kumar, (SC) : Law Finder Doc id # 2907481

Share this article: