Supreme Court Condemns Prolonged Pretrial Detention, Calls for Bail System Reforms in Landmark Hussainara Khatoon Case

Court orders immediate release of undertrial prisoners held for years without trial, emphasizes right to speedy trial as part of fundamental rights under Article 21

In a landmark judgment dated February 12, 1979, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Hussainara Khatoon and others vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, exposed the grave injustice faced by thousands of undertrial prisoners languishing in jails for years without trial, many for minor offenses. The bench comprising Justices P.N. Bhagwati, R.S. Pathak, and A.D. Koshal issued scathing criticism of the administration of justice in Bihar, describing the prolonged pretrial detention as a “shocking state of affairs” and a “travesty of justice” that violates the fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The petition revealed that numerous undertrial prisoners, including women and children, had been incarcerated for periods ranging from three to over ten years without even commencing trial. The Court highlighted the discriminatory nature of the existing bail system, which disproportionately affects the poor due to its reliance on monetary sureties and bonds, effectively denying bail to those unable to afford it while allowing the affluent to secure pretrial freedom easily.

Justice Bhagwati emphasized the urgent need to reform the bail system, advocating for the use of personal bonds without monetary obligations in appropriate cases where the accused has strong community ties and no risk of absconding. The Court outlined factors to be considered in granting bail without sureties, including the accused’s length of residence, employment status, family ties, reputation, prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense. This approach aligns with progressive bail reforms seen in other jurisdictions such as the United States.

Furthermore, the Court underscored that a speedy trial is implicit in the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21, drawing reference from its previous ruling in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978). The Court deplored the unacceptable delays in commencing trials, sometimes stretching over several years, and called upon the State Government to establish and adequately staff more courts to ensure timely justice.

In an interim relief order dated February 5, 1979, the Court directed the immediate release of certain undertrial prisoners on personal bonds without any monetary conditions, recognizing the exceptional circumstances of their prolonged detention. The judgment also condemned the practice of “protective custody” of women in jails, directing their transfer to appropriate welfare homes.

The Bihar Government was instructed to complete pending police investigations expeditiously, preferably within three months for cases delayed beyond two years, and to release undertrial prisoners where chargesheets were not filed within statutory limitation periods. The Court also mandated regular production of undertrial prisoners before Magistrates as required under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and called for scrutiny of compliance.

This judgment is a milestone in Indian criminal jurisprudence, asserting that justice delayed is justice denied and that the criminal justice system must be humane, equitable, and efficient. It has inspired subsequent reforms aimed at protecting the rights of undertrial prisoners and ensuring that bail and speedy trials are accessible to all, especially the indigent.

Statutory provisions

Article 21, Constitution of India;

Sections 436, 437, 167(2), 167(5), 468, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

---

This news report captures the essence and key directives of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Hussainara Khatoon case, reflecting the Court’s concerns about the systemic failure to provide timely justice and the urgent need to reform the bail system and trial procedures to protect fundamental rights.

Hussainara Khotoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna, (SC) : Law Finder Doc Id # 173373