Supreme Court Directs Efficient Functioning of Virtual Court for Accused's Appearance

Procedural Issues Addressed in Surendra Pundalik Gadling Case; Trial Court to Expedite Decision on Prosecution’s Application

In a significant directive, the Supreme Court of India has issued orders to ensure the efficient functioning of the Virtual Court (VC) system, allowing accused individuals to appear remotely. The judgment, delivered by Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi on December 1, 2025, pertains to the criminal appeal case of Surendra Pundalik Gadling versus the State of Maharashtra.

The court has emphasized the importance of resolving procedural issues to facilitate smooth virtual appearances by the accused, amidst technical difficulties reported by the defense. This decision arises from the appeal filed by Surendra Pundalik Gadling, represented by Senior Advocate Anand Grover and a team of legal experts. The appellant sought remedies to address procedural delays and inefficiencies in the trial court’s handling of applications and virtual court appearances.

The judgment outlines a clear timeline for procedural actions, directing the trial court to address the prosecution's application for calling of records by January 15, 2026. The appellant has been granted a week to file a reply to the said application. This step is part of a broader effort to streamline judicial processes and ensure timely justice.

Highlighting the importance of virtual court functionalities, the Supreme Court has instructed the State of Maharashtra to ensure that the technological aspects of the VC are functioning effectively. This directive aims to overcome any hindrances in virtual appearances, a necessity given the increasing reliance on digital platforms in judicial proceedings.

The judgment also notes the recent bail of co-accused Jyoti Jagtap, indicating developments in the broader legal context of the case. The Supreme Court has scheduled further proceedings for January 21, 2026, underscoring its commitment to closely monitoring the implementation of these directives.

Legal experts have praised the Supreme Court’s proactive approach in addressing technological and procedural challenges in the judicial system. By prioritizing efficient virtual court operations, the judgment reflects the judiciary’s adaptability to modern needs and its dedication to upholding fair trial standards.

The ongoing case of Surendra Pundalik Gadling, marked by its complexity and high-profile nature, continues to draw attention to critical aspects of criminal procedure and the evolving role of technology in legal processes.

Bottom Line:

Directions issued to Trial Court for resolving procedural issues and ensuring efficient functioning of VC for the accused to appear through virtual mode.

Statutory provision(s): Criminal Procedure, Virtual Court (VC)

Surendra Pundalik Gadling v. State of Maharashtra, (SC) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2815906