Supreme Court Orders Formation of SIT for Fair Probe into Nilesh Adivasi's Unnatural Death

Special Investigation Team mandated to ensure impartial investigation while safeguarding witnesses and considering multiple narratives.

In a significant move, the Supreme Court of India has directed the establishment of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the mysterious death of Nilesh Adivasi. This decision comes amid conflicting allegations from the deceased's family members and concerns over potential evidence tampering.

The case, involving FIR No. 329/2025, centers on allegations of harassment and torture leading to Nilesh Adivasi's death, implicating a former Home Minister and his associates. The Supreme Court, recognizing the challenges faced by the local police in conducting an unbiased investigation, has stepped in to ensure justice and transparency.

Headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, the bench exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to mandate the formation of an SIT. The team will consist of three impartial officers, including a senior IPS officer from outside Madhya Pradesh, to lead the investigation. The SIT is tasked with examining all aspects of the case, including varying accounts from the family and other potential motives behind the incident.

The Court has emphasized the need for a swift and independent investigation, instructing the SIT to conclude its inquiries within a month. Provisions for witness protection have been underscored, ensuring that no undue influence is exerted on key witnesses like the widow, Reva Adivasi.

The Supreme Court's intervention highlights the urgency and sensitivity surrounding the case, aiming to safeguard the interests of the victim's family and maintain public confidence in the judicial process.

Bottom Line:

Investigation into unnatural death - Formation of Special Investigation Team (SIT) to ensure impartial, independent, and fair investigation into the death of Nilesh Adivasi, considering conflicting versions from close family members and possible influence or destruction of evidence.

Statutory provision(s): Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS), Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Govind Singh Rajput v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (SC) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2820942