No Interim Relief Granted as Nomination Filing Deadline Passes
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has decided to scrutinize the legality of the amended rules introduced by the Bar Council of India in October 2025. The decision was rendered during the hearing of a writ petition filed by Srinivas G, which also included a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal. The bench, comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, chose not to issue any interim directions given the expiration of the nomination filing deadline.
The petition, represented by senior advocates including Ms. Priya Hingorani and Mr. Narender Hooda, contests the recent amendments to the rules governing the Bar Council. The Bar Council of India, represented by senior advocates like Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, resisted the plea for interim relief.
The court has scheduled the next hearing for February 20, 2026. Until then, parties are allowed to file counter affidavits. The bench's decision not to provide interim relief stems from the elapsed deadline for nominations, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural timelines.
This case underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring the legality of administrative rules and regulations that govern professional bodies in India. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the legal fraternity and the functioning of the Bar Council.
Bottom Line:
Examination of the legality of the rule amended in October, 2025, with no interim directions issued due to the expiration of the last date for filing nomination.
Statutory provision(s): Administrative Law
Srinivas G v. Bar Council of India, (SC) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2844205
