Court dismisses writ petition challenging passport cancellation; cites potential threat to sovereignty and integrity of India.
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court on January 29, 2026, dismissed the writ petition filed by Mr. Akram Ali Mohammed, challenging the revocation of his passport by the Union Government of India. The decision was made by Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka, who emphasized the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution and the overriding national security concerns involved in the case.
Mr. Akram Ali Mohammed, a journalist with substantial reach through his online platforms, had his passport revoked by the Regional Passport Authority following a report from the Intelligence Department. The report suggested that Mr. Mohammed’s activities might be prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India, linking him to anti-national elements and unlawful activities.
The petitioner's counsel argued that the revocation violated Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, citing a lack of due process and natural justice. However, the court highlighted that the principles of natural justice have exceptions, especially when public interest and national security are at stake. The court asserted that the renewal of a passport is not an automatic right but is subject to stringent rules and regulations.
In its judgment, the court referred to past cases, including those from the Punjab and Haryana and Rajasthan High Courts, but found them inapplicable due to differing facts and circumstances. The court concluded that the allegations against Mr. Mohammed and the associated security concerns justified the decision to revoke his passport.
The writ petition was thus dismissed, reinforcing the government's stance on prioritizing national security over individual rights in cases of potential threats to the nation.
Bottom Line:
Passport renewal is not automatic and is governed by rules and regulations. Activities under surveillance by police, particularly when alleged to affect sovereignty and integrity of India, do not justify granting relief under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Statutory provision(s): Passports Act, 1967 Section 10(3)(c), Constitution of India, 1950 Articles 14, 19, 21.
Mr. Akram Ali Mohammed v. Union Government of India, (Telangana) : Law Finder Doc id # 2850768
