LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Tribunal Remands Ashutosh Metal Pvt Ltd Case for Further Examination Under Gujarat State Laws

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | December 15, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Tribunal Remands Ashutosh Metal Pvt Ltd Case for Further Examination Under Gujarat State Laws

Service Tax Tribunal Partially Upholds Tax Demand, Orders Reevaluation of Premium Income from Land Transactions


In a significant judgment, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) West Zonal Bench at Ahmedabad has remanded the case of Ashutosh Metal Pvt Ltd for further examination under Gujarat State laws. The tribunal's decision comes amidst complex disputes over service tax applicability concerning premium income from land transactions and commission income from the export of agricultural produce.


The case revolves around two primary issues: the premium income of Rs. 252.53 lakhs received by Ashutosh Metal Pvt Ltd from the transfer of rights in immovable property and the commission income received from the export of Indian raw cotton. The tribunal found that while the appellant argued that such transactions were not services under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, the tribunal deemed it necessary to examine whether the agreement to sell, known as 'banakhat' in Gujarat, created valid rights in immovable property that could be transferred for consideration.


The tribunal partially upheld the service tax demand on commission amounts of Rs. 71,75,382 and Rs. 90,56,280 for financial years 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively, finding the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to justify exemption claims under Notification No. 13/2003-ST. The debit letters produced by the appellant were considered one-sided and insufficient without any confirmation from the other party, leading the tribunal to confirm the Commissioner's order on this issue.


Furthermore, the tribunal supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to suppression of facts with intent to evade payment of service tax. Despite the appellant's reliance on past Supreme Court judgments, the tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant's financial reporting that indicated an intention to evade tax.


The tribunal's decision to remand part of the case to the adjudicating authority marks a crucial step in addressing the intricacies of service tax law in relation to immovable property and highlights the importance of state-specific regulations in determining tax liabilities. The remand allows Ashutosh Metal Pvt Ltd the opportunity to present additional documentary evidence to substantiate their claims regarding premium income from land transactions.


The judgment underscores the tribunal's meticulous approach in balancing legal interpretation with factual examination, ensuring that tax liabilities are assessed accurately in accordance with both national and state laws.


Bottom Line:

Service Tax - Transfer of rights in immovable property and commission income - Analysis of applicability of service tax on premium income from transfer of rights in land and commission income from sale of Indian raw cotton - Matter partially remanded for examination under Gujarat State laws.


Statutory provision(s): Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, Notification No. 13/2003-ST, Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.


Ashutosh Metal Pvt Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Ahmedabad South, (CESTAT)(West Zonal Bench at Ahmedabad)(Regional Bench) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2822340

Share this article: