LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher’s Appeal on Pay Scale Dispute

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | March 9, 2026 at 3:00 PM
Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher’s Appeal on Pay Scale Dispute

Court Holds School Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction Over Pay Scale Grievances Under MEPS Act


In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by Deepali Dinesh Naik against the Krantivir Chafekar Education Society, asserting her entitlement to a higher pay scale. The court held that the School Tribunal does not have jurisdiction over disputes related to pay scales under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 (MEPS Act).


The case revolved around Naik's claim for a graduate pay scale after acquiring a Bachelor of Arts degree during her tenure as a teacher. She argued that her seniority and enhanced qualifications entitled her to the higher pay scale, which was allegedly granted to less senior colleagues.


Justice Amit Borkar, presiding over the matter, clarified that Section 9 of the MEPS Act limits the Tribunal's jurisdiction to specific grievances such as dismissal, removal, termination, reduction in rank, or supersession in promotion. The court emphasized that disputes regarding salary scales or pay scales do not fall under these categories, and thus, the Tribunal cannot entertain such appeals.


The petitioner, who was appointed in 1986 with S.S.C. and D.Ed. qualifications, sought to challenge the School Tribunal's decision, which had denied her appeal for a higher pay scale. The Tribunal had previously ruled that her claim did not involve a reduction in rank or supersession in promotion, and therefore, was not maintainable.


The court further noted that while teachers acquiring higher qualifications during service may be entitled to a higher pay scale under government policy, this does not extend the jurisdiction of the School Tribunal as prescribed by the MEPS Act. The court referenced precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Tryambak Chaudhary, to reinforce the principle that jurisdiction must align strictly with statutory provisions.


Ultimately, the High Court dismissed Naik's petition, reiterating that the statutory conditions necessary to invoke the appellate remedy were not met. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to legislative frameworks when addressing service-related grievances in educational institutions.


Bottom Line:

Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act - Dispute related to grant of pay scale does not fall within the jurisdiction of School Tribunal under Section 9 of the Act - Section 9 does not provide a general right of appeal for every service-related grievance but is restricted to specific situations such as termination, reduction in rank, or supersession in promotion.


Statutory provision(s): Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, Section 9


Deepali Dinesh Naik v. Krantivir Chafekar Education Society, (Bombay) : Law Finder Doc id # 2849789

Share this article: