LawFinder.news
LawFinder.news

Daughters entitled to a share in the father's property as Class I heirs

LAW FINDER NEWS NETWORK | May 19, 2026 at 5:10 PM
Daughters entitled to a share in the father's property as Class I heirs

Supreme Court Upholds Daughters' Rights in Hindu Succession Case, Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Judgment, Reinstates Plaint in Landmark Partition Suit


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has set aside a Karnataka High Court judgment that dismissed a partition suit filed by the daughters of a Hindu male who died intestate in 1985. The apex court's decision reinstates the plaintiffs' claim to their father's estate, emphasizing the rights of daughters as Class I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.


The case, titled B.S. Lalitha v. Bhuvanesh, revolved around whether the daughters of the deceased, who were excluded from a registered partition deed executed in 2000, had a legitimate claim to a share in their father's property. The High Court had previously rejected their plaint, citing a supposed jurisdictional bar under Section 6(5) of the Hindu Succession Act, as amended in 2005.


The Supreme Court, however, clarified that Section 6(5) is a saving clause, not a jurisdictional bar, and does not preclude the institution of a suit for partition. The court underscored that the daughters' rights as heirs under Section 8 of the Act predate the 2005 Amendment and are unaffected by Section 6(5).


Justice Augustine George Masih, writing for the bench, articulated that the principle of res judicata barred the second application for rejection of the plaint, as the identical issue had already been decided by the High Court in 2013. The Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of trial to resolve contested questions of fact and law regarding the validity of the partition.


The ruling reaffirms the Supreme Court's commitment to upholding gender equality in inheritance rights, aligning with the landmark decision in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, which recognized daughters as coparceners with equal rights to ancestral property.


Statutory provision(s): Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Order VII Rule 11, Section 115), Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Section 6, Section 8)


B.S. Lalitha v. Bhuvanesh, (SC) : Law Finder Doc id # 2899647

Share this article: